To: rollo tomasi
"Odd question since we know that many have heard of Jesus." Nope, BILLIONS have not.
Of course there are many who haven't heard, but your question was "what if NO ONE had heard of Jesus?" Big difference.
Your attempt to distract others from my point of what the Catholic church calls "necessary" (and then says isn't) may work for you, but you haven't done anything to show me where I'm wrong about the catechism.
62 posted on
04/12/2013 2:20:21 PM PDT by
ScubieNuc
(When there is no justice in the laws, justice is left to the outlaws.)
To: ScubieNuc
"what if NO ONE had heard of Jesus?"
Sorry you got me, "ouch" I am hurt, but implications/short hand is necessary on devices that have a small electronic touch screen keyboards. "No one" was implied to include all that who never heard of Christ. Only those who are not smart asses would get the implied point.
63 posted on
04/12/2013 3:03:54 PM PDT by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson