More fiction from Rome.
That’s only if recorded history is fiction. Apparently, confused by the facts, some can’t tell the difference between fact and fiction.
I suspect that a lot of antipathy toward the Roman Church is that others do not have a verifiable 2,000 ear history that has been documented. They do not have the history, the mystery, the martyrs, saints, the art, architecture, great cathedrals, the claim of canonizing scripture, and amazing richness the Roman Catholic Church has. I don’t hold it against them, however. Those who believe in the Trinity are all right by me.
The folks I know, who’ve been brave enough to actually read history, have since converted to Catholicism.
The doubters on this thread should read Eusebius’ “History of the Church” written in AD 325. One of its main themes is Apostolic Succession, and it is painstakingly detailed.
A few questions I have is this:
If you say that the history of Rome is fiction, WHY are non-Catholic Christians come into the Church each year?
Could it be that it is realizing the great prayer of Jesus as in John 17 that all Christian believers shall be ONE?