Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Vermont Crank
On Tuesday, 11 May 2010 Pope Benedict stated,

Consequently, I would say that, here too, beyond this great vision of the suffering of the Pope, which we can in the first place refer to Pope John Paul II, an indication is given of realities involving the future of the Church, which are gradually taking shape and becoming evident.

I didn't make this up, its from the Vatican website, INTERVIEW OF THE HOLY FATHER BENEDICT XVI WITH THE JOURNALISTS DURING THE FLIGHT TO PORTUGAL

Yes, Pope Benedict contradicted the script written by the Vatican Secretary of State in 2000. In 2000, the Vatican Secretary of State stated the Third Secret was in the past. In 2010, Pope Benedict clearly contradicted the prior Vatican statement and said the Third Secret is still unfolding, and applies to the future.

I'm simply relating facts here, make of it what you will.

12 posted on 03/18/2013 11:22:54 AM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Brian Kopp

Well, if anyone figures out when he was being truthful and/or accurate, post it, please


14 posted on 03/18/2013 12:07:46 PM PDT by Vermont Crank (invisible yet are signs of the force of Tradition that'll act upon our inertia into Indifferentism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp
Dear Dr Kopp. The then Prefect of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, wrote what I posed (the link) his own self.

Some soi disant trads have the eyes of The Lynx and can spot rodents from a long distance away while others purporting to be Trads - like those in The Brick By Brick Bund, and other fearful communicants of the coterie of conservative catholics - have the eyes of moles and see only what is directly in front of them at the moment; and when it is pointed-out to them that what they believe at that moment is contradicted by official evidence issued from their same favorite sources, they ought at least, don't you think, confess confusion - at best?

The previous paragraph was just an exercise of creative rhetoric intended to draw attention to the difference amongst soi disant traditionalists and while it could easily be misconstrued to be a personal attack against Bishop Emeritus Bendict XVI, that was definitely not my intent.

Dear Doctor. You have a well-deserved reputation for orthodoxy and it was never my intent to advance any argument indicating otherwise. I just wanted to address this one matter; and I have now done that and I will no longer continue to hijack this thread.

Thank you for your patience.

19 posted on 03/18/2013 12:47:59 PM PDT by Vermont Crank (Invisible yet are signs of the force of Tradition that'll act upon our inertia into Indifferentism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson