Declaring one's self the winner, is usually sign they have lost the debate.
You've "wacked" nothing, overall. The other poster points clearly to the errors incorporated in the RC aplogetic.
I can clearly see that only by ingnoring certain items (quite a list, actually) one can pretend to have solidly whacked them.
This is a sola freeptura site. Each person can determine when a mole is whacked according to their own interpretation. :)