Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Gluteus Maximus

I see your point, but would argue that for most of the history of the church many clergy were cynical, corrupt, or had other terrible failings. When did the Jesuit Order ever have a good reputation?

I suppose it is not limited to just the church and clergy. In several empires, eunuchs were renowned for their service, but always with the warning that they should never be given real power.

So is bad the price of good? Perhaps. But to lose good out of the rejection of bad or evil would be a tragedy.


81 posted on 02/24/2013 5:37:06 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm all for keeping the priesthood. I'm only saying that in the context of modern technological society CELIBACY RULE = GAY CLERICAL RULE.

I'm merely arguing to end the celibacy rule for nearly all future ordinations. It's just another HR issue, really. This would certainly address the immediate problem. Like I said above, we can keep celibacy for monks and cloistered nuns, but the price of that is that they not have regular contact with laity.

82 posted on 02/24/2013 5:46:49 PM PST by Gluteus Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson