Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: SeaHawkFan
I can’t help my self, does any one understand until proven guilty. This is a very serious case. The girl was ten years old. Is hard to find information on her because of age. Ihave found that intercourse was not invalved. "touching near " what ever that means. my contact have gone closed mouth. A fool would take a cop on this. looks alot like hesaid and she said.
32 posted on 02/25/2013 6:43:32 AM PST by BlueMoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: BlueMoose

The guy may have done it, but unless there was some physical evidence, or witnesses who could state specific times and places, i would not vote to convict. Merely claiming it was within a designated long time period would not be enough for me.

Anyone who claims a young teenage girl wouldn’t lie about something like this to maybe get out of trouble, does not know teenage girls.

It’s the one crime for which someone can be convicted without witnesses or physical evidence.


34 posted on 02/25/2013 10:49:38 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson