If all life is random and meaningless, there is no way anyone can have a wasted or unwasted life. Indeed, all our discoveries in science and technology are equally meaningless. ____________________________________________
Agreed, he is the one to be much pitied. It is he who has not only wasted and trashed his life, but has feverishly used it to caused great and irreparable damage to the eternal souls of those it is his duty to be leading into the truth of God.
Also, just as Dawkins does not know God, he cannot have any idea at all, as an atheist, about what really good and great sex is, which cannot be known, experienced nor understood apart from the inspiration of Almighty God, in the confines of holy matrimony. Poor guy doesn't even know what he is missing in the realm of a much vaunted life's pursuit, sex, for he has only experienced it on one dead and materialistic level.
Dawkins either doesn't know he got pwnd, or else lacks the honesty to admit it, first to himself.
Furiously flailing about within the philosophy that was just his own undoing can't bring any relief.
It reminds me of the liberals who always want to raise taxes or pass laws that only apply to 'those other people, over there'.
If it's all materialism, Dawkins' whole life is meaningless...or else the good Mr. Ratzinger's own scholarly approach (to the discussion those two had) has undeniable merit.
lol at Dawkins? or