Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Lee N. Field

Good post. I was wondering when somebody would set the record straight on these bogus writings. Plus, Josephus didn’t include Maccabees as inspired scripture. I think we would do well if we stuck with the canon we have.


35 posted on 02/14/2013 6:19:18 PM PST by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: sasportas; ducttape45

Maybe I just notice it more (some kind of selection bias), but lately I see too many people chasing after really foolish things.


36 posted on 02/14/2013 6:49:40 PM PST by Lee N. Field ("You keep using that verse, but I do not think it means what you think it means." --I. Montoya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: sasportas

I agree with you on ‘bogus writings’ however I believe Maccabees was part of the canon for all Christians until its removal for Protestants during the Reformation.

I think it is included because it is in the Septuagint, used by early Christians.

In any case I wouldn’t take Josephus (if we’re thinking of the same Josephus) as an authority on the canon.


37 posted on 02/15/2013 1:27:05 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson