“There was never supposed to be an actual Bible.”
Then you don’t consider any Canon to be authoritative?
“Scripture was never supposed to be limited to a few books.”
So, then, which books do you consider authoritative?
“There are a couple books in the current KJV that are not scripture.”
Ok, then you accept the apocrypha because the KJV was originally printed with it. ;)
You also can’t argue, “there never was intended to be a canon”, and then accept a canon that never existed prior to the 16th century, a millenium and a half after they were written.
It seems pretty clear to me that your standard is whatever you want to accept. :) Are you a prophet?