[Mrs. Don-o]

Hoodat, "State's Rights" is one approach with some real positives, since we could get good, protective, human-rights-based legislation in many, many state legislatures much faster than the 40 years of futility we have eexperienced with the Federal govt.

However it does not address the question of intrinsic right and wrong. If you were a legislator in one of these states, freed from the Federal restraints of Roe vs Wade, to what extent would you vote to protect unborn babies and pregnant mothers in your state?

[MeOnTheBeach]

If you were a legislator in one of these states, freed from the Federal restraints of Roe vs Wade, to what extent would you vote to protect unborn babies and pregnant mothers in your state?

I would copy how the left does it. Start out by getting your foot in the door with something that's hard to argue against, infanticide and partial birth abortion would be my picks.

Showing films of this stuff going on in ads leading up to going public with legislation would almost guarantee public support.

Then move up from there. Accomplish the wish list one piece at a time.

But enforcement of any regulation will be ugly. You'll have to have some way to question a doctor's diagnosis if you allow for exceptions. A review panel? (Sound familiar?)

Otherwise, leftist doctor's will make everyone woman fit in the exception category.