Replies

I suppose when they can declare themselves infallible and insert meanings into scripture they can also ignore some of it? They take the comment by Christ and misinterpret it to usurp Christ’s authority but neglect to also quote the part where Christ called Peter “satan”. Go figure.

I thought it really interesting that the Catholics start a thread with a article that admits that the time and teaching of Peter in Rome is really “uncertain” “solved only on hypotheses”.

From the article
“As to the duration of his Apostolic activity in the Roman capital, the continuity or otherwise of his residence there, the details and success of his labours, and the chronology of his arrival and death, all these questions are uncertain, and can be solved only on hypotheses more or less well-founded.

I would shudder in fear if my faith and salvation was based on “uncertain” and “hypotheses”.

I’ll stay founded on the Rock of Jesus.