Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Religion Forum threads labeled “Ecumenical”

Ecumenical threads are closed to antagonism.

To antagonize is to incur or to provoke hostility in others.

Unlike the “caucus” threads, the article and reply posts of an “ecumenical” thread may discuss more than one belief, but antagonism is not tolerable.

More leeway is granted to what is acceptable in the text of the article than to the reply posts. For example, the term “gross error” in an article will not prevent an ecumenical discussion, but a poster should not use that term in his reply because it is antagonistic. As another example, the article might be a passage from the Bible which would be antagonistic to Jews. The passage should be considered historical information and a legitimate subject for an ecumenical discussion. The reply posts however must not be antagonistic.

Contrasting of beliefs or even criticisms can be made without provoking hostilities. But when in doubt, only post what you are “for” and not what you are “against.” Or ask questions.

Ecumenical threads will be moderated on a “where there’s smoke, there’s fire” basis. When hostility has broken out on an “ecumenical” thread, I’ll be looking for the source.

Therefore “anti” posters must not try to finesse the guidelines by asking loaded questions, using inflammatory taglines, gratuitous quote mining or trying to slip in an “anti” or “ex” article under the color of the “ecumenical” tag.

1 posted on 01/06/2013 3:34:56 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: narses; Reaganite Republican; Clintons Are White Trash; HerrBlucher; mgist; raptor22; ...

A number of folks have asked about this, some with apparent sincerity. Here is the Catholic view (which I agree with, of course.)


2 posted on 01/06/2013 3:36:57 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses; Reaganite Republican; Clintons Are White Trash; HerrBlucher; mgist; raptor22; ...

A number of folks have asked about this, some with apparent sincerity. Here is the Catholic view (which I agree with, of course.)


3 posted on 01/06/2013 3:37:26 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses

Westminster Confession of Faith, Chapter 32:

2. At the last day, such as are found alive shall not die, but be changed: and all the dead shall be raised up, with the selfsame bodies, and none other (although with different qualities), which shall be united again to their souls forever.

3. The bodies of the unjust shall, by the power of Christ, be raised to dishonor: the bodies of the just, by his Spirit, unto honor; and be made conformable to his own glorious body.

http://www.opc.org/wcf.html#Chapter_32


11 posted on 01/06/2013 5:46:25 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses

Why would people want their bodies back?


14 posted on 01/06/2013 6:10:33 PM PST by stuartcr ("I upraded my moral compass to a GPS, to keep up with the times.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses

Why would people want their bodies back?


15 posted on 01/06/2013 6:10:48 PM PST by stuartcr ("I upraded my moral compass to a GPS, to keep up with the times.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson