Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick
DING - DING - DING - DING!

Ladies and gentlemen, we have a WINNAH!!

You are exactly right. For a man (a certain kind of man, for convenience we'll call him a triflin' Leftist man, but hey, could be secular white Right or even Libertarian!) the ideal lust object being another MAN (or boy, they're smoother and tauter) --- and any lingering repugnance over unseemly contact with the solid waste system is quickly overcome by the consideration that no surprise offspring will ensue, and no intricate emotional entanglements. In short, no baby and no baggage.

And here's an ever sadder thing: Germain Greer was saying something LIKE this 40+ years ago in "The Female Eunuch"--- oddly, though: forever getting it smack-right, and then instantly reversing and upending herself.

She used to say that the hellacious thing about gender stereotyping is, not that gay men are expected to be feminized like women, but that women are expected to be eunuchs like gay men.

Greer used to say that men (here again, she means trifling Leftist men, the only kind she knew) hate women, though the (Leftist) women do not realize this and are taught to hate themselves.

At one point she yells, "I’m sick of being a transvestite. I refuse to be a female impersonator. I am a woman, not a castrate!

Then she goes on to idiotically recommend that all women become female nullos anyway, no functional attachment-feelings, no really functional attachment-parts, all their fertility and feelings disabled---

I mean, how is a contracepting or sterilized woman so much different from a F2M Trannie? Basically your systems have been knocked out, hormonally and/or surgically doctored, neutered, "fixed."

All that's left is artifice. You may was well be an android.

[I-hate-contraception-and-female-nullification-rant-mode-OFF]

32 posted on 01/04/2013 10:46:36 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("You can observe a lot just by watchin'." - Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

Somebody else has always thought of things before I did! Not that that’s bad or anything ...

A lot of data fit this paradigm. There’s the idea that all women, even married ones innocently shopping at Walmart, are on a sexual display like men in a San Francisco “pride” parade. There’s the lack of criticism of a sexually immoral woman, UNTIL she’s pregnant or has a child: she goes from “hottie” to “slut” if she steps out of the role of no-consequences sexual outlet. There’s the ever-more-open favoring of sodomitic sex acts, even among men who consider themselves heterosexual, along with the disparagement of natural women’s bodies of all descriptions. There’s the expectation that women, even casual acquaintances, should comfortably, with men, view lewd pictures or participate in lewd conversation.

Random point: We were listening to a rock station on satellite radio last night while I was driving some kids to a Scout meeting, and the announcer starting talking about his penis! After quickly changing the station (”Not BLUEGRASS!”) I observed that the speaker was either homosexual or at the maturity level of a newly potty-trained 3-year-old.


34 posted on 01/04/2013 12:11:56 PM PST by Tax-chick (Mostly just confused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson