Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor

“Some of the apocrypha are valid history, ...”

According to editor-surveyor. I disagree. My opinion, based on prayer and study is just as valid as yours, no?

“...ans {sic} some are obvious, self-contradicting fiction.”

According to editor-surveyor. I disagree. My opinion, based on prayer and study is just as valid as yours, no?

“None of them offer doctrine in a truthful manner.”

According to editor-surveyor. I disagree. My opinion, based on prayer and study is just as valid as yours, no?


108 posted on 12/25/2012 4:02:44 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: narses; editor-surveyor
>>According to editor-surveyor. I disagree. My opinion, based on prayer and study is just as valid as yours, no?<<

Judith 1:1 While King Nebuchadnezzar was ruling over the Assyrians from his capital city of Nineveh,

Nebuchadnezzar didn’t rule over the Assyrians he was King over Babylonia.

2 Kings 24:1 While Jehoiakim was king, King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylonia invaded Judah

So which one is correct? 2 Kings or Judith1? They can’t both be correct. In you study and prayer I’m sure you have the answer.

Tobit claims to have been alive when Jeroboam revolted in 931 B.C. and 210 years later when Assyria conquered Israel in 721 B.C. Then it says in Tobit 14 that he was 112 when he died. Oops!

So which is it according to your study and prayer?

116 posted on 12/25/2012 5:36:58 PM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson