CynicalBear:
And you know they were wrong How? How does Paul not mentioning Peter suggest he was not in Rome or did not eventually get to Rome. Nothing you cite from Romans 1 suggest that Peter never was in Rome. If you want to say, Peter was not in Rome in 58AD, that is about all you can say.
Those closer to time all indicate Peter was in Rome.
I think you really need to do some study on when the RCC claims Peter was in Rome. I believe you will find that they claim that Peter was in Rome some 16 by the time Paul writes to the Romans saying he will establish them. I suppose I assumed wrongly that you knew what you were talking about rather then just parroting what the RCC states.