[A.A. Cunningham]

Webster couldn't find his backside with both hands if you spotted him nine fingers:

Refutation of Protestant Polemicist William Webster's Critique of Catholic Tradition & Newmanian Development of Doctrine

[RnMomof7]

Really.... lets see some proof of the teachings of the EARLY church fathers on the assumption and papal infallibility..?? How about on Peter being the pope.. lets see something from the 1st 50 years after Christ

[Rashputin]

Webster also contradicts himself fut facts and truth don't matter to the anti-Catholic crowd. Otherwise, they wouldn't insist Babylon is code for Rome where doing so suits their fantasies but doesn't represent Rome when Scripture refers to Peter being in Babylon.

Folks who are that dishonest obviously worship their own, Most High and Holy Self rather than Jesus Christ.

That's why such folks rely on the Lego Block Method of Scripture Interpretation to create their own personal religion, why they attack the Church Jesus Christ Himself founded, and why the strong delusion they're under keeps them comfortable while they hurry along to their own destruction.

What else can you really expect from people who claim to believe in a subset of Scripture that includes the exhortation to preach "Christ and Him crucified", but are as horrified by a Crucifix as the typical Hollywood Vampire is?