[one Lord one faith one baptism]

i see another thread about michael rood.

instead of dancing around and around, why don’t we get right to the crux of the matter, the heart of Christian doctrine, namely WHO IS JESUS CHRIST?

can we get a straight answer from rood on who is Jesus Christ?

rood says he is the Messiah, so far so good.

a lot of people believe He is the Messiah, including Mormons, Jehovah Witnesses, etc.

but does rood believe Jesus Christ is the eternal Son of God, begotten of the Father, the eternal Word who became man to live a sinless perfect life and willingly sacrificed His life for the forgiveness of sins and to reconcile the elect in His Body to the Father? true God and true man?

can we get a straight answer from rood on this?

[Errant]

i see another thread about michael rood.

The ancient Hebrew scriptures described in the linked broadcast which Nehemia Gordon, a Karaite Jew, discovered locked away in Jewish archives, are a VERY significant find for the Christian world and are the topic of this thread.

[editor-surveyor]

>> “instead of dancing around and around, why don’t we get right to the crux of the matter, the heart of Christian doctrine, namely WHO IS JESUS CHRIST?” <<

.
Yes!

And if we do that, we’ll be putting the RCC out of business, since they think he is Mithras, and celebrate Christ’s birth on Mithras’ birthdate.

If you took the trouble of reading or watching what Rood has produced, you would see that he is right on WRT who Christ is.

[Errant]

but does rood believe Jesus Christ is the eternal Son of God, begotten of the Father, the eternal Word who became man to live a sinless perfect life and willingly sacrificed His life for the forgiveness of sins and to reconcile the elect in His Body to the Father? true God and true man?

I don't speak for Rood, but from what I've heard him say, I believe you'd get a really loud Hoah! on all of the above.

Feel free to email him that question if you still have doubts.

[roamer_1]

can we get a straight answer from rood on this?

While I am no expert on Rood (and no defender either, as he seems fit to defend himself)... It seems to me that one who would rely upon a known spurious document (Galesian Decretal), and when called upon it, continues as if the call had not been made... Such a one who seems comfortable with such a thing would be the last to demand purity tests of others... JMO.

And further, if one's time is SO admittedly valuable as to not be able to view the OP, nor even view the links brought up in defense of the OP, to the point of being wholly ignorant of the subject at hand... How does one as busy as all that ever find time to throw stones from the sidelines of this thread? And to what end?

It is a mystery.