The instance we're talking about, though, is not "overall," but is specific; and not just "specific" but, more than that, an absolute singularity: never happened in the Universe before, and will never happen again: the case of the one woman hailed with the unheard-of and noble title Kecharitomene ("All-Filled with Grace") by an angel and who consented to the procreative act by which God was made Man.
If such acts even between two humans are holy --- which we agree they are --- then this indescribable procreation between God and a human woman, must be incomparably more sacred.
Humans procreate children who are (even though flawed by having a sin-marred human nature) bearers of the image and likeness of God. But Mary was wed, not by a man coming into her, but by the Holy Spirit coming upon her (in the Archangel's words) --- are you saying this would create a bond inferior in strength, durability, or significance to the bond between mere human procreative partners?
Really?
Don't we see great signs in Scripture that this Divine-human procreative espousal created a lasting bond?
Note how the first Pentecost came precisely when Mary and the Apostles were gathered in the Upper Room. Now they were all, --- accompanying the espoused Mary --- filled with the Holy Spirit!
The Bride Unwed has a bond to the Holy Spirit: one of total consecration. This deserves to be thought upon with care. Note how at the end of time (Rev 22:17) you catch yet another glimpse of this enduring nuptial bond: "The Spirit and the Bride say, Come!"
"And let him who hears, say Come!"
“who consented”
She didn’t have a choice.
And Joseph was her rightful husband, in no way denied his right to her.
What, she was an adulteress for marrying Joseph?
A marriage without consummation isn’t.