“What I’m referring to is common knowledge, and it is silly to have someone demanding I pen a peer-reviewable paper.”
I’m not demanding that, just asking that you don’t use a fallacious argument, like appealing to the popularity of a thesis as evidence of its validity. Like I said, if you could demonstrate that the argument was valid through nonfallacious means, then you wouldn’t need to appeal to its popularity, and if you can’t do that, then appealing to its popularity demonstrates nothing.
We have already established that appealing to a popular, theological position is not a fallacious argument. As I recall, you backward-acceded to that concession.
As you also recall, that is, as I stated, the reason that “Church not appearing after chapter 4 Revelation” is to be considered as one evidence for a pre-touchdown rapture.