The statement was that protestants always use Revelation to attack the Catholic Church. (Post #30: ALL Protestan theorists use Reveleations to continue their attack on the Catholic Church.) Scott Hahn was a protestant convert to catholicism, so obviously he wasn't using Revelation to attack the Catholic Church. Do you suppose as he rowed across the Tiber that he kept muttering to himself, "Rome is the Whore of Babylon, but I'm doing this anyway."?
(What have you authored?) Is there some reason I was supposed to have authored a book on the subject?
What part of conversion do you not understand?
Are you suggesting Scott wrote on Revelations, prior to his conversion, and in those writings, did not attack the Catholic Church?
You said you didn’t hold the view in question, as though you are an example of a Protestant, who doesn’t site a negative Catholic role in Revelations.
My assertion related to AUTHORS, not individuals, so I was wondering what you may have written.