Despite the lengths your home page must go to (and which proves you do not simply respond by prayer and simply preaching repentance) - including "thought experiments at Temporal Mechanics" (you and the LDS remind me too much of the types of explanations in some of Swedenborg's work) - in order to attempt to justify the novel unScriptural teachings of Mormonism, the fact remains that the God Mormons point to was once a man who evolved into God, contra Ps. 90:2 (cf. Jn. 4:24) and that the heavens and earth were created by a council of Gods, while the Son was a product of God's conception thru Eve, one of his many wives, making Jesus a spirit brother to Lucifer, and whose plan for mans progression was rejected in favor of Christ's.
And that no church is preaching the gospel except the LDS, and yet they complain about being targeted.
And which has been plainly and abundantly documented by others, and you can take up your "explanations" with them. Even the idea that David was not forgiven but was suffering in Hell (rather than the grave being referred to in Acts 2) testifies to how you must conform Scripture to Mormonic (yes, i see that as accurate as "Quranic") doctrine.
D “Despite the lengths your home page must go to (and which proves you do not simply respond by prayer and simply preaching repentance)”
Acquired over a decade of answering the same questions over and over, I simply compiled some of my answers into a page to save time.
D “including “thought experiments at Temporal Mechanics” (you and the LDS remind me too much of the types of explanations in some of Swedenborg’s work) - in order to attempt to justify the novel unScriptural teachings of Mormonism, the fact remains that the God Mormons point to was once a man who evolved into God, contra Ps. 90:2 (cf. Jn. 4:24) and that the heavens and earth were created by a council of Gods, while the Son was a product of God’s conception thru Eve, one of his many wives, making Jesus a spirit brother to Lucifer, and whose plan for mans progression was rejected in favor of Christ’s.”
Are you engaging in a bit of Temporal Mechanics yourself? You seem to have things out of order, and out of context, and backwards.
Anyone who’s interested in trying to decipher what you are saying about my page is welcome to read said page (just click my name).
Rest assured it has an index, is divided by topic, and links to lots of external references.
Delph