Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: forty_years; annieokie; penelopesire; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; thouworm; SE Mom; ...

This article moves even further away from the truth and further and further from why the film and the film MAKER matters.
The film MAKER is not a Copt, he is a muslim with connections to the brotherhood, and he was born in Egypt. His partner was a falsestinian terrorist...who just happens to be the first cousin of Walid Shoebat.
He is ALSO an fbi asset since he pled guilty to bank fraud years ago.
The first mention of him in relation to this film was that he was a billionaire Israeli Jew...and that the film cost millions of dollars to produce. WHY?
And why, when it was discovered, (quite by accident,) that the still unidentified guy was not a Jew, was he then defined as a disgruntled Copt? Neither story is true.
WHY did the American Embassy in Cairo send their people home early and APOLOGIZE for the film before any demonstration had ever taken place?
WHY, if not to give the brotherhood a completely fabricated reason to protest the American Embassy in Cairo which set off the entire ME and gave COVER for the ultimate murderous attack on Benghazi and Ambassador Stevens?
The film MAKER is in jail not because they want to punish his freedom of speech via the film, but to make absolutely sure that he never tells the truth about the film’s origination, who commissioned it, or why.
He might not have ever known why. It seemed like a simple enough thing for him to do. He didn’t have to have a reason except that he was told to do it by his handlers and they paid for it. No one was ever supposed to know who he was. That might be the entire extent of his involvement UNTIL Walid Shoebat identified him. THEN it became the first order of business by the FBI to get this guy out of sight. Gone.
Do NOT allow yourselves to be misled. Every dot in this saga connects. If you lose one or two, you forfeit the truth.

PING!


6 posted on 11/23/2012 11:39:47 PM PST by MestaMachine (It's the !!!!TREASON!!!!, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MestaMachine

Cleartext:

He was hired by Obama to facilitate the murder of Israel, and he’ll be killed by Obama. Dead men tell no tales.


11 posted on 11/24/2012 12:02:18 AM PST by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (I will fear no muslim))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MestaMachine

“The film MAKER is in jail not because they want to punish his freedom of speech via the film, but to make absolutely sure that he never tells the truth about the film’s origination, who commissioned it, or why.”

Spot on!!!!


13 posted on 11/24/2012 12:49:05 AM PST by vanilla swirl (searching for something meaningful to say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MestaMachine

“The film MAKER is in jail not because they want to punish his freedom of speech via the film, but to make absolutely sure that he never tells the truth about the film’s origination, who commissioned it, or why.”

He’s being held incommunicado? Isn’t that illegal?


17 posted on 11/24/2012 3:20:41 AM PST by Natufian (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MestaMachine

Great reporting...!


23 posted on 11/24/2012 8:21:16 AM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MestaMachine

MM, I’m still fuzzy on what the end game was supposed to be here. Presumably, there was a CIA-managed gun running operation involved, yes? I’ve read that it was the guns and weapons we provided to the Libyan rebels (AKA Muslim Brotherhood/Al Quaida), and that Chris Stephens was supposed to be negotiating (as in paying) to get the weapons back so the gun running operation would never come to light. Then I’ve also read that the gun running involved transferring the US-supplied weapons from the Libyan-based jihadists to the Syrian-based jihadists. Then I’ve also read that the plot was supposed to result in the kidnapping of Amb Stephens so that Ozero could “negotiate” for his return, and possibly the release of the Blind Sheik in exchange.

I’m of the impression that no scenario involving MB/Al Quaida jihadis occurs without the involvement of Iran somewhere in the picture.

What are your thoughts here? One or none of the above, some combination of these, or something else entirely?


26 posted on 11/24/2012 9:52:30 AM PST by lonevoice (Today I broke my personal record for most consecutive days lived)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson