So what is your point in posting this?
Would it be better to have Christians sit home and thus have Obama elected? Are you saying it would be better to have Obama as president?
Or do you really think Virgil Goode can become president if we all vote for him?
No, I suggest Christians vote third party (Virgil Goode)
Are you saying it would be better to have Obama as president?
No. But either-one is highly problematic.
Or do you really think Virgil Goode can become president if we all vote for him?
If you live in one of 14 clear Obama blue states: The Left Coast -- CA, WA, OR, Hawaii; New England states like MA, Maine, CT, Rhode Island; DC area, including MD & Delaware; or NY-NJ; or IL and Minnesota...do you really believe voting for Romney in ANY of those states would actually give Romney a single electoral vote?
Answer is plainly "No" ... so until I see you lecturing Blue-staters in those states NOT to vote for Romney since he has no chance of taking ANY of those states, then spare me the question.
Btw: Virgil Goode of the Constitution Party is on the ballot in the following states:
Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, Washington, -- and if Michigan stays blue, that state, too.
Also, you can readily write in "Virgil Goode" in Illinois and Maryland.
If you live in one of these nine states (well, at least eight even if you subtract Michigan), there's absolutely NO reason to vote for Romney. Obama will win these states, anyway. If you've ever told somebody NOT to vote for a third-party candidate 'cause they'll lose, anyway...well, guess what? Your argument just collapsed on yourself in you live in these given states!!!
Alabama, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia (looking more red than swing now), and Wyoming.
Also, you can readily write in "Virgil Goode" in Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Montana, North Carolina (looking more red now than swing), and West Virginia.
So, even if we exclude Virginia and North Carolina and just concentrated on the other 17 red states listed above, if you're a FREEPER and you vote for Virgil Goode, Mitt Romney will not miss your vote. Obama will still lose these given states!
Therefore, why vote for a liberal pro-abort "god-in-embryo" like Romney when you can't even use a utilitarian relativist reason to do so?
Colorado, Florida (looking more red than swing), Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
Well, this is where it gets "interesting" for utilitarianist philosophies vs. "principle"...
Do you want to train your children & grandchildren to vote always for the "right uniform color" (red) -- no matter what they espouse -- just 'cause it's a political "improvement" over the "blue" team?
Who do you vote for? The idolatry monger "god-in-embryo" Mitt Romney, or the false political messiah who may have Muslim-ties Obama? Or a third party like Virgil Goode -- knowing that God sees your vote?