[fso301]

what counts is this: Which of the two candidates stands overall for biblical positions? Where do they stand on issues of critical importance to us as Christians, like abortion, traditional marriage, religious freedom, and the threat of radical Islam? Thus, the question gets back to this: Regardless of church affiliation, which candidate is most likely to govern according to biblical standards? That's the question to be decided by the conscientious Christian and by all people of good will in this election.

Note to the anti-Mormon crowd. The author points out above how a Christian should vote.

[presently no screen name]

Note to the anti-Word crowd: God speaks to His Own through His Word.

[freedomlover]

“Note to the anti-Mormon crowd.”

---

Do you mean anti-Mormon, or anti-Mormanism?

There is a difference.

[Ingtar]

I have to disagree with you, the author points out above how he thinks a Christian should vote, or perhaps how he wants a Christian to vote. Christians tend to not do so well when they allow one man to think for them.

Neither man has a history of supporting Biblical standards; both have worked to ease the destruction of innocent life and the family. One is now actively pushing these things and the other says he has changed (most of the time) on them. Whether a Christian believes Romney means what he says seems to be the only way to discern what to do in this election. Romney did come across as earnest last night. It is too bad that the so called social issues that most Christians will use to decide were off the table.