Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Former Fetus

A semantic analysis showed that the original language used a noun that considered the hand and the wrist as one. In fact, I know a person from a third-world country who uses “hand” to mean all the way up to the shoulder, although if you pin her down she will acknowledge the modern hand ends somewhere short of that.

Nevertheless, it has been shown in modern research that the two palms can support the weight of the entire body (I think it was a National Geographic special of some kind), and if ropes are tied at the wrist in addition there is really no question at all. So I don’t think the precise anatomical location of the stigmata can be taken to disprove the miracle (especially when it already has been approved by the Church).


12 posted on 09/23/2012 1:31:50 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature not nurture TM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: steve86
As a college anatomy instructor I consider the wrist part of the hand, but most people don't. That's why I asked, I didn't know the background of the people describing the stigmata. One more thing, the Shroud of Turin shows the nail marks on the wrists. It seems to me like any "stigmata" on the palm of the hand would be very suspicious.

I'm not Catholic, so I am looking at the issue almost like a forensic detective. In 1917 anybody wanting to make fake stigmata would have thought of the palm of the hand. That is one of the reasons I believe the Shroud is authentic, it does not match the preconceived ideas of Renaissance Italy.

17 posted on 09/23/2012 1:43:23 PM PDT by Former Fetus (Saved by grace through faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson