Posted on 09/07/2012 10:33:09 PM PDT by Alex Murphy
The time is long since passed when a person who is truly Catholic can vote democrat. There is too much immorality in the democrat platform and has been for a long time. Abortion, perversion, etc., provide the excuse why Catholics can no longer vote democrat or they are not truly Catholic, but just a remnant of what a true Catholic is. There comes a time when a person cannot anymore subvert their conscience and hide from the reality that the democrats are non-religious, non-God, and just a babbling bunch of heathens. Those are the facts. Now, how are you going to vote?
Millions of babies have been aborted via the Democrat pro-abortion policies. Sounds like war . . . no, genocide to me.
Yeah, they ought to form a party that totally focuses on jealousy, envy, covetousness, bitterness and theft. Forget the abortion and sodomy. Stick with fundamentals.
The Democrats are just not pretending as much as they did in the past. Nothing substantively new with the dems.
Don’t be an ass. There is an obviously implied “and” in that sentence.
I hear you. I've been rereading First and Second Kings lately. Baal, Belial, etc. How many times must we humans learn the same lesson? Seems we've been relearning this particular one since the early days of the Jews.
Could you explain your tagline? Thanks.
It is a quote from Pope Leo XIII's encyclical Sapientiae Christianae (On Christians as Citizens). The immediate context of the quote is:
Amid such reckless and widespread folly of opinion, it is, as We have said, the office of the Church to undertake the defense of truth and uproot errors from the mind, and this charge has to be at all times sacredly observed by her, seeing that the honor of God and the salvation of men are confided to her keeping. But, when necessity compels, not those only who are invested with power of rule are bound to safeguard the integrity of faith, but, as St. Thomas maintains: "Each one is under obligation to show forth his faith, either to instruct and encourage others of the faithful, or to repel the attacks of unbelievers.''[12] To recoil before an enemy, or to keep silence when from all sides such clamors are raised against truth, is the part of a man either devoid of character or who entertains doubt as to the truth of what he professes to believe. In both cases such mode of behaving is base and is insulting to God, and both are incompatible with the salvation of mankind. This kind of conduct is profitable only to the enemies of the faith, for nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good. Moreover, want of vigor on the part of Christians is so much the more blameworthy, as not seldom little would be needed on their part to bring to naught false charges and refute erroneous opinions, and by always exerting themselves more strenuously they might reckon upon being successful. After all, no one can be prevented from putting forth that strength of soul which is the characteristic of true Christians, and very frequently by such display of courage our enemies lose heart and their designs are thwarted. Christians are, moreover, born for combat, whereof the greater the vehemence, the more assured, God aiding, the triumph: "Have confidence; I have overcome the world."[13] Nor is there any ground for alleging that Jesus Christ, the Guardian and Champion of the Church, needs not in any manner the help of men. Power certainly is not wanting to Him, but in His loving kindness He would assign to us a share in obtaining and applying the fruits of salvation procured through His grace.
I'm sure you are familiar with the historical context of Pope Leo XIII's times: the Masonic attempts to eliminate the influence of the Church throughout Europe (including Italy) in the second half of the 19th century.
It seems that these times are very similar in many ways.
For millions of Catholics though the word “Democrat” is a snyonym for “Catholic” and shall remain so.
There was no need to launch a personal attack and name calling.
Look at mine and GeronL’s exchange, (which was completed before you jumped in with a personal attack), he knew that I had misread his post and that I was truthfully baffled.
For whatever reason, I had honestly missed the implied ‘and’, that kind of thing occasionally happens on the internet, it wasn’t time wasting, hostile, game playing.
Irrelevant hostility did show up from a third party though.
This guy taught his daughter not to vote Republicans because they are pro war?
///
?
...i can see a point about the Democrats caring more for the poor, etc.
but Republicans pro-war ?!?
-
from WW1 to the bombing of Serbia, what war WASN’T with a Democrat for President ?
(and Serbia was responding to Muslim attacks,
just as we did in Afghanistan...
it would seem to me, that even an anti-war Catholic,
could understand the dangers of Islam...)
The people who vote democrat are CINOs, not real Catholics.
Thanks for that.
No, they are real Catholics, you don’t think that democrat voting Priests, Nuns, Bishops and Cardinals are Catholics?
And this guy ran the National Catholic Register until a couple of years ago. Do you think his politics influenced how NCR reported things?
So the National Catholic Register was run by a CINO for ten years, and no one noticed until now?
Right. I try not to take things too seriously but sometimes I go off the reservation. heh. I even had to report abuse on one of my own posts yesterday. heh. seriously.
I see. I misread the tagline. Because of the lack of a space between “good” and “pope,” I'd misinterpreted that you were saying this ABOUT the “good-Pope Leo.”
Makes a lot more sense now that I can see you were attributing a quote to him.
My error.
Thanks,
sitetest
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.