Replies

You may disagree with her assessment and her style, but saying she is full of herself seems like an odd characterization. The woman is definitely walking the walk.

She should stick to market commentary where she has established some credibility . The fact she is also a so called “traditional” Catholic who loves the Latin Mass is admirable. However, it does not follow that this gives her the charism of reading souls. Her slanderous attacks on Cardinal Dolan and her interpretation of his motives is a disgrace. This undermines any credibility she thinks she has in this regard. Here are a few examples

“ YOU are the poster child for the "ravening wolves" class of wretched clergy.”

“We both know that you don't even believe in hell”

“Cardinal Dolan, along with the majority of the bishops and priests in the western world today DON'T ACTUALLY BELIEVE IN JESUS CHRIST, HIS CHURCH, OR THE EUCHARIST.”

Ann needs to be called to repentance rather than be held up as some type of Catholic hero.

I don't know much about Dolan,

Obviously

but if he is honoring Obama and any of the other pro-abortion, pro-communist, thieves in Washington, then she is right about him.

Has anyone seen an endorsement by Dolan for Obama or Romney? Is engaging the enemy a bad thing?

All I can say is that if the rest of the US had the same balls as Barnhardt, we would have overthrown this corrupt government by now and re-instituted the US Constitution, instead of hoping and praying that a corrupt, immoral jackass like Romney is going to save us.

Ann is fine within her area of expertise. She is not an expert on Dolan, his motives or the state of his soul.

"but if he is honoring Obama and any of the other pro-abortion, pro-communist, thieves in Washington, then she is right about him."

Has anyone seen an endorsement by Dolan for Obama or Romney? Is engaging the enemy a bad thing?

I didn't say a thing about endorsing. I said "honoring". "Honoring" includes inviting Obama to a Catholic dinner, or, quite frankly, to any Catholic event. Engaging the enemy would mean Dolan meets with Obama to tell him why his policies are so wrong and to change the error of his ways. Inviting him to participate in a dinner, without engaging him, is an honor.

“Her slanderous attacks on Cardinal Dolan and her interpretation of his motives is a disgrace.”

I do believe her remarks are slanderous.

There are many times when I believe that the cyber world has robbed us of our need to weigh the prudence about the words we write and to consider their consequences.

The last time I looked, the word “contumely” was still there in my (Catholic) “Moral Guidance” book.