[Dr. Sivana]

well you know that anything by Picasso is not art!



Not true. He just found he could make more money the other way. The infuriating thing about Picasso was that he was capable of making truly great work, rather than purposefully degenerative stuff found in his cubism.

[RegulatorCountry]

Even his early ventures into abstraction reveal a great deal more talent than his well known works, very tonal and highly textured.

[Reily]

I was referring to the cubism, etc. which is to me a visual temper tantrum.

Your example is indeed “art”.