“”Immanuel means God with Us, or With us is God” Yes and that was Isaiah using prophetic language that was fulfilled in THAT day...not 700 years into the future. The sign was for Ahaz...remember...and G-d WAS certainly with them when the two kings who threatened Israel were killed. Isa 8:10. Take counsel and it will be foiled; speak a word and it will not succeed, for God is with us. See the prophetic connection? It has nothing to do with Jsus.”
Jesus Christ is literally God with us. That is why the sign is that of a virgin (almah, young unmarried maiden) giving birth to Immanuel, el’gibbor (the mighty God), the everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace, as the scriptures as a whole testify.
“Jesus Christ is literally God with us.”
Right. Come on...He didnt know the hour of his return...he prayed to himself in the garden? Talked to himself on the cross? He lied to the high priest about teaching nothing in secret? He was wrong about JTB being Elijah..he called a gentile woman and her people dogs...he falsely prophecised his return before they all died... Twice he dissed his own mortal mother...He said equality with G-d was something that could not be grasped...He cursed a fig tree for no reason when it wasnt even the right season...he took a farmer herd of pigs and killed them without compensation...he didnt even bother to write ONE word of his own...when G-d wrote the ten commandments in STONE? Jsus cant even write?
uhhh yeah...this is NOT G-d with us. A false prophet and another failed messiah.
Oh and I checked again...you did not answer these.
“B) Not one verse in all of Tanakh (OT) does it say the Law will end and be replaced by a “law of christ”
C) Not one verse in all of Tanakh does it say that messiah will fulfill the law on our behalf (thus ending the law)”
Care to try again?