People have the right to make moral judgements for themselves. We as a society reject homosexuality for our own personal reasons, be it religious or it simply is disgusting to us. What has me bothered is that regardless of why we have chosen our views, we have them and are entitled to them, yet, the homosexuals want us to accept their behaviors without question. They want to remove our freedom of choice, which does violate our rights to religous freedom.
“People have the right to make moral judgements for themselves. We as a society reject homosexuality for our own personal reasons, be it religious or it simply is disgusting to us. What has me bothered is that regardless of why we have chosen our views, we have them and are entitled to them, yet, the homosexuals want us to accept their behaviors without question. They want to remove our freedom of choice, which does violate our rights to religous freedom.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
True, and as RF pointed out we as a society once rejected birth control and heterosex out side of marriage.
Somehow the devil (One being named Margaret Sanger) got inside our churches and changed all that.
Although some of use still believe that way it would appear we are in the minority.
Yes RF I too somehow suspect birth control and abortion has lead to homosexuality but am unsure of exactly how. Homosexuals have always been with us just in the closet. So why after BC and abortion came about did they come out of the closet?
Yes they thrust it in our face and want us to accept them. I can’t help but wonder if we did not go after all the hetero sexual immorality (sex out of wedlock, porn, et cetera) that is around is and clean it up maybe we could rid ourselves of the rest?
We had an earlier post today that brought up a forgotten American black hero George S. Schuyler
(
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/who-was-george-schuyler_640518.html&ei=JQgfULuvJ-mL6gHDx4CgBw&usg=AFQjCNG5iimb3ZgNPqthIf2ToaWgWaayXQ
),
who is forgotten to most people because the Progressives and Marxists want him forgotten, because he was a Conservative, who while still knowing in his day that much needed to change for many blacks, socially, he believed the law, and most particularly federal law was a bad instrument and the wrong instrument to do it.
But the "gay activists" and the "gay activist agenda" was born with a lot of other Progressive and Marxists agendas of the 1960s, and carries with it the socialist ideals that first marry "the society" and "the government" as one entity (because government is democratic) and therefor the force of law - government - can be the ultimate source of "social justice" and similar social goals.
I see the agenda of the "gay activists" to demand "marriage" and deny acceptance of "civil unions" is not a demand for tolerance or even "equality under the law" which "civil unions" like the one in New Jersey can do. It is an attempt to use the law to demand "acceptance", socially and otherwise.
But no "acceptance" demanded by the law is true acceptance because it is not obtained by the free will of those from whom it must be GIVEN. The use of law means it - acceptance - is taken, not given. No form of true respect can be taken.
Before we are done, people will come to understand that that philosophy leads to a society that extinguishes tolerance, because it extinguishes diversity and thereby tolerance becomes irrelevant.
It is amazing that that agenda is proceeding with great success (for now) at pretending it is all for diversity and tolerance. How far it will get at extinguishing diversity before the people wake up is anyone's guess.