I have no idea if there is any truth to this article or not but see my previous post. It says they attended this church which means nothing. Our church has had people that attended for years and years and because they are not members, which occurs in a very specific and defined manner, they cannot teach a class, they cannot keep the nursery, they cannot fill any church office, and it is possible, as I stated, that they cannot get married but I am not sure about that because I do not have a copy of our constitution handy and cannot remember anything about that.
Knowing the nature of our enemies, your skepticism is healthy. The article states specifically that the couple was refused a wedding because of their race. If this is not so, if the refusal was for some other reason, then this church should sue for libel. This type of trick (if that's what it is) is just what the Dems need to get folks' minds off of Obama's endorsement of "gay marriage."
However, if the story is accurate, those responsible for this decision should be ashamed of themselves and subjected to church discipline, if it is available.