Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
Many Catholics before Trent did not consider the Apocrypha books as Canonical, meaning defining doctrine.

They were considered important works on various subjects such as history, and that is why the KJB had them between the testaments as being non-Canonical.

The Cardinal is simply broadening the word 'Canonical' to make it mean something it doesn't mean.

The Canon refers to those books that define Christian doctrine and are directly given by God.

The Apocrypha books are not part of the Canon.

9 posted on 07/27/2012 5:25:33 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: fortheDeclaration
The Apocrypha books are not part of the Canon.

In your unlearned opinion. The Deuterocanonicals are not part of the abridged, edited versions of Scripture that showed up centuries after the original. The corrupted KJV, not KJB, was produced over 12 centuries later. However, they were there when the 73 book canon was closed in 405 AD by Pope St. Innocent I.

25 posted on 07/28/2012 6:24:36 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson