There could never be any evidence for the Cardinal, because evidence for something that never happened, or don't exist, ect... can not possibly exist. Otherwise, it is an explicit sin against your neighbor to fling filthy allegations and then claim the "evidence" is hidden, or was somehow lost. ie. "the dog ate my evidence, then he died".
"Matt Abbotts discussion about the circle the good padre ran with...
Ah ha! Guilt by association. Selective association at that, because "the good padre" was the head and leader of the USCCB, a member appointed by and in good standing amongst the Magisterium and the Pope. That don't matter with Mr. Abbott though, since Mr. Abbott's will was not honored, YOPIOS notwithstanding. All that matters with Mr. Abbott and whats his name et al, is that Cardinal Bernardin is defamed in the most heinous way.
2 Timothy 4:3-4,
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; and they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
If you're going to defame Mr. Abbott, the least you could do is ping him to the thread.