What insolence! You are the one who once again made this personal with me by fallacious charges, while engaging in criticism of my scholarship, which per usual has been unsubstantiated, unproven, and false.
One man's "spit-wads" is another mans affirmation of Truth.
You can argue with the ump and as usual, charge them with bias, but the fact is the you would be out on strikes a long time ago if not for their manifest leniency toward you.
Discuss the issues all you want but don't make it personal - unless you want to risk others responding in kind in defense.
And John, i do apologize for any imputation of motives to you.
Yes, let's do.