A self avowed agnostic is a strange person to pose that question to.
I’m talking about the Big Bang, accepted as true based on the evidence and the equations, by atheist scientists and evangelist scholars alike.
The interesting point I was making is that the laws of nature were nonexistent then. The most common objection to miracles is to say that they violate the laws of nature.
But the Big Bang shows us the laws of nature are neither universal nor permanent.