No, I don’t. I have to consider their voracity and decide who’s word I’m willing to “put my faith” in.
All students of history necessarily trust that which others have seen, and more often they necessarily trust that which others have written about what others have seen:
“Based on the current archaeological records, the analysis supports that the book of Acts is credible and records historic events that actually happened. This is concluded at the 99.9% confidence level. Paul had to actually travel the roads and be in various locations to record such unique details that have been confirmed by archaeology.”
http://www.harvardhouse.com/correlate_1.htm