Human beings have only the rights G-d gives them . . . no others.
Circumcision of infants or children should be banned as a violation of human rights.
"Should?" The only one Who can say "should" is G-d. And if G-d says that Jewish male children should be circumcised on their eight day, then that is exactly what should be done.
There are no laws but G-d's laws. "Secular law," like "secular morality" and "secular ethics" is ultimately a contradiction in terms. The only reason it is wrong to murder is because G-d has so decreed. And when G-d decrees that someone be killed (via the death penalty, war, or extermination of the Canaanites) then it is equally wrong not to kill.
It's time to put secular "rights," "laws," "morals," and "ethics" out of their misery.
Okay, Sir. Consider this *REALISTIC* situation: a male child is born premature (24 weeks, for example) to a Jewish mother and is highly vulnerable to the nature of the post-natal care taken. Should this child be forced to risk death by being forced to undergo a ritual "eighth-day" genital mutilation, a.k.a, circumcision? If not, then why not? And when else?