If the above weren't true, then would the reverse apply to you? As in, for example, would you endorse the concept of a trinitarian god, as truth? Yes or no?
If you have a problem answering this question, and if you have the capability to recognise that the same can hold true with another individual when it comes to their personal beliefs against yours, you will understand the importance of recognising that such beliefs are, you guessed it, personal.
If the above weren't true, then would the reverse apply to you? As in, for example, would you endorse the concept of a trinitarian god, as truth? Yes or no?
If you have a problem answering this question, and if you have the capability to recognise that the same can hold true with another individual when it comes to their personal beliefs against yours, you will understand the importance of recognising that such beliefs are, you guessed it, personal.
Wrong, bub. The idea of religion as "personal beliefs" is a modern loony concept that only came into existence during the "enlightenment."
There are no "personal beliefs." There is only objective reality, which is G-d and His Commandments.
Get your head out of Voltaire's bunghole, Tom Paine.