[Olog-hai]

That’s extremely well-put. The more subtle pushes for “Aufhebung der Familie” such as declaring that children’s consent has to take precedence over parental consent have to be defended against.

Liberals and leftists are not very clear about their ever-changing dogma though. A claim that you have a right to your own body on one hand is countermanded by declaring that people that are even infected by HIV have a “right to sexual pleasure” as the International Planned Parenthood Federation unilaterally declared two years ago . . . ‼ (so if someone rejects your sexual advances, your “rights” are therefore violated and vice versa?!?)

[Tax-chick]

Yes, leftists are always discovering new “rights,” such as our “right” to be forced to buy health insurance, or our “right” to be prevented from buying large containers of soft drinks. Older rights, such as the right not be killed because the mother doesn’t want a baby now, seem to have vanished. On the other hand, there’s the right to have a baby, by any means, if natural conception and birth don’t happen under the usual plan.

They must get awful headaches trying to keep this straight. It’s like playing a game with my 10-year-old, who changes the rules to make sure he wins, always with a perfectly straight face and no sense of self-contradiction. Why, reality is such that Pat wins, and that is that!