Those who train their children and grandchildren how to operate based upon pragmatic utilitarian political relativism will one day result in their children and grandchildren voting for an (R) candidate to the left of Obama because he's to the right of the (D) candidate.
To show you how this works, perhaps Obama could lose this election, switch to the (R) party...gain the nominee status...and then run vs. a more liberal (D) guy...
Then we'd have posters like you advocating that we vote for Obama as the "lesser of two evils" and the "lesser impacts on our back accounts" and all the other relativistic drivel we hear...
Didn’t even that wackadoo pastor Jeffress say he would reluctantly vote for Romney if he unfortunately wins the nomination?
How come he wasn’t accused of relativistic drivel at the time? I mean back then the sides were reversed, with all the LDS critics on FR supporting him for saying Christians shouldn’t vote for LDS! I thought it was reasonable for a Baptist pastor to be critical of an LDS canidate at the time, especially when there were other choices. But if there weren’t other choices, even pastor Jeffress said he would hold his nose which I also thought was reasonable.
Freegards