The prophets are usually humble people who love God very much and the exception a great sinner at the time who God chooses to help all of us come to believe.
On what basis are their words considered true?
The messages line up with magisterial teachings, oral tradition, prophecy given the saints and Scripture, which is (right now) non-Catholic Christian's lone authority.
How have they received their *revelations*?
Doesn't Scripture say something about hearing a voice behind thee. The prophets usually hear an "interior" revelation and a few actually hear God's voice and a third, not many, Our Lord and the Blessed Mother appear to them.
Have they been correct 100% of the time as required by God?
God always reveals the truth, that's one 100% but some prophecy already given is changed by man's believing, changed by mankind's prayers and actions. One of the major reasons God speaks to us, to every generation through prophets.
Why should we accept their words as true?
The words in prophecy make explicit God's revelation. prophecy helps the faithful live more fully in a certain period of history.
For that matter, why should we accept them at all?
No one is required to believe private revelation -prophecy-. If they don't, it's their loss. Do not reject your own Protestant messenger. Glynda's messages are shared on a two Catholic sites I know of, her messages line up with Catholic prophecy though not as explicit and that is for a reason. Does this mean Catholics are more open to God's messages? I hope not, it saddens God.
~ The sites are besides her own, shared in the OP.
www.catholicbinder.com
Yahoo Groups - Seers 2
So, if I told you that God told me something, you’d believe that as well?
And that lady, whoever she is, who I never heard of before, isn’t MY own Protestant messenger. I’m not obligated to accept what she says just because someone else says she’s Protestant.
So, you know what makes God sad?
Really?
About that land in FL, I’ll cut you a really good deal.