Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Natural Law; metmom
Us? Exactly who, besides yourself, do you speak for? As far as I know you are a denomination of one. That might make for a convenient communion, but nothing else.

Metmom speaks for me, too. That is how EVERY church I have attended does it - other than the Catholic one, which is her point, isn't it?

I think it is a very good point she made that it is the blood that makes atonement for the soul; Jesus instituted the bread AND the wine for a remembrance of His flesh and blood; and leaving OUT the wine in the Lord's Supper Communion observance certainly IS suspect. I'll bet it plays into the reason why Catholicism teaches the Eucharist must be taken immediately (if possible) after confession is made so that the soul can again attain a "state of grace". It is the blood of Christ, Scripture says, that cleanses us from all sin. The early church certainly included both. So much for the "unchanging" faith.

1,164 posted on 06/03/2012 10:43:57 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1157 | View Replies ]


To: All; boatbums

“I think it is a very good point she made that it is the blood that makes atonement for the soul; Jesus instituted the bread AND the wine for a remembrance of His flesh and blood; and leaving OUT the wine in the Lord’s Supper Communion observance certainly IS suspect. I’ll bet it plays into the reason why Catholicism teaches the Eucharist must be taken immediately (if possible) after confession is made so that the soul can again attain a “state of grace”. It is the blood of Christ, Scripture says, that cleanses us from all sin. The early church certainly included both. So much for the “unchanging” faith.”

~ ~ ~

Please explain, how is Our Lord’s suffering, agonizing, loss
of almost, maybe all, every drop of His blood on the Cross become a “REMEMBRANCE” of His horrible death by a person consuming a piece of bread and a sip of wine or eating a cracker and a sip of grape juice?

Doesn’t fit. “REMEMBRANCE” is misinterpreted.

When Our Lord said “remembrance” He was instructing the
Apostles, the first priests to do as He had just done,
confect the Holy Eucharist. They and their successors have
for 2000 years!

Non-Catholic Christians accept Jesus is the Passover Lamb in the New Covenant but reject or do not recall what followed? They CONSUMED the sacrificed Passover Lamb.

Jesus’ presence in the consecrated bread and wine are the
same, and now, a rather lame objection. Who can figure it?

Protestants, why would you care? You reject the Real Presence. Jesus states in prophecy, you cannot mature spiritually without the most Holy Eucharist.

To repeat, for the life of your soul, accept what God shows
you, Catholics too, during the Great Warning.

The most Holy Eucharist is God Himself. You won’t get waylaid during the Great Tribulation if you come to believe in Our Lord’s presence in the Eucharist.


1,168 posted on 06/04/2012 12:30:35 AM PDT by stpio (ue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson