[Natural Law]

"I may have looked a Strong’s once or twice in my life. Not an excellent source as far as I’m concerned."

Then can you explain why you choose as corroboration two websites whose positions are based upon nothing more that extractions from Strongs? All in all it makes your rejection of the Magisterium look completely arbitrary.

[CynicalBear]

>>Then can you explain why you choose as corroboration two websites whose positions are based upon nothing more that extractions from Strongs?<<

which web sites did I “choose as corroboration” that use Strongs? For that matter, which websites did I choose period?