People are not Romnet-bots for wanting to get rid of Obama. Look around! Will this country survive another obama term? Zero has big plans in store. No more conservatives on the radio perhaps? 'Hate speeh' after all. No more 'hate speech' on the 'net, ie no more FR? Maybe see about having the second amendment taken out, somehow someway?
Zero has big plans. Thats for sure. Our primary concern MUST be to get him out!
“People are not Romnet-bots for wanting to get rid of Obama. Look around! Will this country survive another obama term? Zero has big plans in store. No more conservatives on the radio perhaps? ‘Hate speeh’ after all. No more ‘hate speech’ on the ‘net, ie no more FR? Maybe see about having the second amendment taken out, somehow someway?”
You raise a good point with regards to accusing conservatives of hate speech. My response is to look at the U.K. and Canada. Most of the attacks by government agencies accusing conservatives of hate speech have come from lefty activists appointed by CINO politicians.
For instance, Alberta is considered Canada’s most conservative province. The conservative party has ruled there for the past 30 years with huge majority governments. (Although that’s about to change in a couple weeks when the Tea Party-like Wildrose Alliance topples the RINO/GOPe-like Progressive Conservative Party).
However, when the party got taken over by CINOs acting like liberals, Christian pastor Stephen Boisson and Jewish conservative political commentator Ezra Levant found themselves hauled before the quasi-judicial Alberta Human Rights Commission - the former for criticizing same-sex marriage, and the latter for republishing Danish cartoons of Mohamed in a national conservative magazine. Both of these individuals were forced to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees to defend themselves against lefty government activists appointed by CINO politicians.