I have no objection to links within in argument in order to substantiate or supplement it, or to support a related issue, or to occasionally refer one to resources for informational purposes, but object to posting a bunch of links in response to an argument as a substitute for a response of your own.
Agreed. Hence I don’t post links, perhaps some reference material, but links? No.
“but object to posting a bunch of links in response to an argument as a substitute for a response of your own.”
Look. So we are in your class . Not a free open exchange of ideas or beliefs among conservatives. It is a belief. Let’s Get off the lawyering mode. It is shown for what it is in history of the church. If we read what is presented we can understand the other view. I read your posts. I found it interesting either way.
“but object to posting a bunch of links in response to an argument as a substitute for a response of your own.”
Look. So we are in your class . Not a free open exchange of ideas or beliefs among conservatives. It is a belief. Let’s Get off the lawyering mode. It is shown for what it is in history of the church. If we read what is presented we can understand the other view. I read your posts. I found it interesting either way.
Sorry! Repeat!