Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

"....cufflinks, starched shirts, learning, and reasonably civilized manners do not a good bishop make. Jesus Christ never required that his disciples place roses in his room or mints on his pillow. He walked straight at the decadent elites of His time on Earth, denounced them as a "brood of vipers," and then called it a day. It didn't take long for these vipers to kill Him.

"Wuerl can only earn the red of his rich robes through a willingness to endure the blood of Jesus Christ's martyrdom. And the truth is that protecting the Sacraments would cost him far less than death. Maybe Joe Biden wouldn't clap him on the back so heartily after that. Maybe he would get an angry letter or two from moneyed donors in the tank for the Dems. But who cares?

This latest episode isn't even a close call. If Cardinal Wuerl doesn't have the guts to deny Communion to an agitprop lesbian Buddhist, he should just close up shop and hand the keys to his chancery over to Obama."

1 posted on 03/20/2012 10:47:05 PM PDT by Robert Drobot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nanetteclaret; 6323cd; fatima; Rosary; morphed; MarineMomJ; TAdams8591; vox_freedom; sneakers; ...
He that knoweth his brother to sin a sin which is not to death, let him ask, and life shall be given to him, who sinneth not to death. There is a sin unto death: for that I say not that any man ask. All iniquity is sin. And there is a sin unto death. ( Blessed Apostle Saint John 5:16-17 )

A sin which is not to death : It is hard to determine what Blessed Apostle Saint John here calls a sin which is not to death, and a sin which is unto death. The difference can not be the same as betwixt sins that are called venial and mortal: for he says, that if a man pray for his brother, who commits a sin that is not to death, life shall be given him: therefore such a one had before lost the life of grace, and been guilty of what is commonly called a mortal sin. And when he speaks of a sin that is unto death, and adds these words, for that I say not that any man ask, it cannot be supposed that Blessed Apostle Saint John would say this of every mortal sin, but only of some heinous sins, which are very seldom remitted, because such sinners very seldom repent. By a sin therefore which is unto death, interpreters commonly understand a wilfull apostasy from the faith, and from the known truth, when a sinner, hardened by his own ingratitude, becomes deaf to all admonitions, will do nothing for himself, but runs on to a final impenitence. Nor yet does Blessed Apostle Saint John say, that such a sin is never remitted, or cannot be remitted, but only has these words, for that I say not that any man ask the remission: that is, though we must pray for all sinners whatsoever, yet men can not pray for such sinners with such a confidence of obtaining always their petitions, as Blessed Apostle Saint John said before, ver. 14. Whatever exposition we follow on this verse, our faith teacheth us from the holy scriptures, that God desires not the death of any sinner, but that he be converted and live, Ezech. 33. 11. Though men's sins be as red as scarlet, they shall become as white as snow, Isa. 3. 18. It is the will of God that every one come to the knowledge of the truth, and be saved. There is no sin so great but which God is willing to forgive, and has left a power in his church to remit the most enormous sins: so that no sinner need despair of pardon, nor will any sinner perish, but by his own fault.

”A sin unto death : Some understand this of final impenitence, or of dying in mortal sin; which is the only sin that never can be remitted. But, it is probable, he may also comprise under this name, the sin of apostasy from the faith, and some other such heinous sins as are seldom and hardly remitted: and therefore he gives little encouragement, to such as pray for these sinners, to expect what they ask.”

2 posted on 03/20/2012 11:14:26 PM PDT by Robert Drobot (Fiat voluntas tua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robert Drobot

Dr. Edward Peters on Neumayr’s column:

http://canonlawblog.wordpress.com/2012/03/19/george-neumayrs-double-barreled-blast-of-cdl-wuerl-was-very-wrong/


5 posted on 03/21/2012 12:02:13 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robert Drobot
"....cufflinks, starched shirts, learning, and reasonably civilized manners do not a good bishop make.

Your quote is interesting. I've only met Cardinal Wuerl once -- when he was Aux. Bishop of Seattle. He had come to dedicate our new church, and I was helping out in the kitchen preparing a banquet in his honor. He came in, late in the evening, to thank us for the meal and to collect his rain coat which was hanging on a hook outside the kitchen door. I was stunned at how immaculately he was dressed -- not a wrinkle in sight. The same with the kakhi raincoat. It looked like nobody had ever sat down while wearing it. And then there were those piercing blue eyes. Very impressive man in appearance.

7 posted on 03/21/2012 2:00:02 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robert Drobot
This latest episode isn't even a close call. If Cardinal Wuerl doesn't have the guts to deny Communion to an agitprop lesbian Buddhist, he should just close up shop and hand the keys to his chancery over to Obama."

That style of "confrontation" makes him uncomfortable, he told a persistent reporter...."


12 posted on 03/21/2012 6:20:37 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ( I am Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson