To: Colorado Cowgirl
Mary had many other children: Matthew 12:46 While Jesus was still talking to the crowd, his mother and brothers stood outside, wanting to speak to him. Acts 1:14 They all joined together constantly in prayer, along with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with his brothers. Mark 6:3The ancient Aramaic language had no word for cousin. Jesus had no brothers and sisters. The ancient Jews even used "brothers and sisters" for other people of their village and ALL cousins.
If Jesus had had brothers, He would have consigned His mother's care, speaking from the Cross, to one of His brothers, not to John. It would have made NO sense for Jesus to tell John to take care of Mary if there had been other children of Mary. She had no other children.
To: cloudmountain; Colorado Cowgirl
But Matthew was written in Greek and there is a word for cousin in the greek so that would have been used.
And, Jesus still could have consigned Mary to John because she was a spiritual mother, not because there were no physical brothers. Scripture states, Mary believed, but most (if not all) of his family did not. Why would he trust his mother to unbelievers?
76 posted on
03/17/2012 4:17:24 PM PDT by
reaganaut
("I once was lost, but now am found, was blind but now I see")
To: cloudmountain
Aramaic Bible in Plain English (©2010) These all were continuing together in prayer with one soul with the women and with Maryam, Mother of Yeshua, and with his brothers. Acts 1:14 Aramaic NT: Peshitta ܗܠܝܢ ܟܠܗܘܢ ܐܟܚܕܐ ܐܡܝܢܝܢ ܗܘܘ ܒܨܠܘܬܐ ܒܚܕܐ ܢܦܫ ܥܡ ܢܫܐ ܘܥܡ ܡܪܝܡ ܐܡܗ ܕܝܫܘܥ ܘܥܡ ܐܚܘܗܝ ܀ Again no cousins? Words have meaning! Except of course Obama, we let him get away with Constitutional murder. All others must provide proof, I just did!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson