[metmom]

Any argument you have against that Scripture you have against God and Paul, who wrote it, not smvoice or metmom who simply pointed out the TRUTH contained in Scripture that is spelled out clearly and plainly for anyone to read who wants.

Nobody is forcing you to believe it, but to continue to deny it sure cuts into your credibility.

[Natural Law]

"Any argument you have against that Scripture you have against God and Paul, who wrote it,"

You are giving St. Paul too much credit. CCC 105 God is the author of Sacred Scripture. "The divinely revealed realities, which are contained and presented in the text of Sacred Scripture, have been written down under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit."

"For Holy Mother Church, relying on the faith of the apostolic age, accepts as sacred and canonical the books of the Old and the New Testaments, whole and entire, with all their parts, on the grounds that, written under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, they have God as their author, and have been handed on as such to the Church herself.

[MarkBsnr]

Any argument you have against that Scripture you have against God and Paul, who wrote it, not smvoice or metmom who simply pointed out the TRUTH contained in Scripture that is spelled out clearly and plainly for anyone to read who wants.

I have no argument with either God or Paul. I have an argument with those who would elevate the words of a bishop of the Church above the words of God. Anyone who follows Paul to the exclusion of Jesus Christ is not Christian. It is exemplified in various heresies identified during the first millennium after Christ.

Nobody is forcing you to believe it, but to continue to deny it sure cuts into your credibility.

Let's look at whose credibility is in question. Anyone who produces prose to the effect that disagreement with them equals disagreement with God has effectively lost the argument.