Good question. Are they planning to have a human smuggling "coyote" testify to say he'll keep bringing juvenile illegals into America regardless of the law, because it's a "rights" issue? How about Woody Harrelson testifying that he will continue to smoke and grow marijuana against the law because he has a right to and so do teenagers? Why does Congress need ANYONE to testify to breaking laws unless it is to force them to negate the laws? Then you have a states rights issue that the Supreme Court will be forced to address.
What's next, making rape legal? People still rape other people so let's legalize it? Heck why not make bank robbing legal? Why not letting homeless people live free in bank-owned foreclosed houses? Wait... they ARE doing that now. It used to be called trespassing or squatting. Now it's legal?
“Why does Congress need ANYONE to testify to breaking laws unless it is to force them to negate the laws?”
You said it better than I could. Negate parental responsibility, which is essential to any functioning society, while trivializing the Rule of Law by allowing “the right kind of people”, like a busybody lesbian priest (coll) to take the pregnant daughter of some nobody to an abortion mill. Deconstructionism.