Yeah, I guess God also guided the hand of Constantine and his bishops as well as King James and his bishops. These “versions” of the bible were “inspired” by political motives far more than religious motives.
It has always amazed me how so many people become entrenched in the concept of infallibility of the bible, in particular the old testament, but deride the concept catholics have of the infallibility of the pope.
It might be better service to God if the lessons of the bible, especially the new testament, were given more attention than the carefully edited collection of old testament books which were collected and edited by emperors and kings.
Let me say, in all sincerity and kindeness, you're clueles about the subject of how these translations came about, and those since then. Willfully ignorant, in fact.
The ancient patristic writings provides evidence of a universally accepted canon long before Constantine or any council of bishops.
It was the scholars looking at various comparisons of the ancient documents who did the work.
Since the ancient documents have varied so little over time, why do you have issues with them and claim they are more fallible than popes?